It’s a sad time in Queensland. It harks back to the bad old days of the Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen government denying Queenslanders the right to protest.
Brisbane bicycle users planned a May 30, 2025 protest to demonstrate to the Brisbane City Council that action needed to be taken to open the pedestrian and bike pathways across the Story Bridge. The planned protest would have closed the Bradfield Highway (the road that runs across the Bridge) for an hour one Friday.
Police argued that it would not be safe enough and that they didn’t have enough resources to ensure protestor safety and, so, they took it to court, who upheld the Police’s action.
At the time, I questioned this. Is it not the Police’s job to ensure that safety for it’s citizens? If they are sufficiently under resourced, should that be the more alarming question for Senior Queensland Police than a few people riding their bikes on a bridge?
Then we arrive at Yesterday (21/08/2025) when the ABC News website displayed the article titled Pro-Palestinian protest over Brisbane’s Story Bridge won’t be allowed, Queensland court rules.
Once again, the Police argued that they have insufficient resources to Police the protest “for the safety of the attendees” and, by doing so, Dan Purdie, the Minister for Police said “”If protesters defy the decision of the court, it will not only put people at risk, it will also take hundreds of police away from responding to crime… ”
First of all, “Hundreds”?
Second of all, given the geographical location of the Story Bridge, it would be incredibly easy to stop traffic from approaching the bridge. A couple of cars at each end. A few “Road Closed” signs which dont even have to be from the Queensland Police. There are plenty of Road/Traffic Management companies Council or the State Government could use to effect road closures which wouldn’t even need to come out of Police numbers.
No, Queensland’s chief magistrate Janelle Brassington has, instead, bowed to the wishes of the current regime, hell bent on not providing the service that is meant to protect them, and to quash a fundamental part of a democracy.
And that’s the right to protest.